×
  • remind me tomorrow
  • remind me next week
  • never remind me
Subscribe to the ANN Newsletter • Wake up every Sunday to a curated list of ANN's most interesting posts of the week. read more

Forum - View topic
INTEREST: Mushoku Tensei Author Comments on Series' Depiction of Slavery


Goto page Previous    Next

Note: this is the discussion thread for this article

Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
NeverConvex
Subscriber



Joined: 08 Jun 2013
Posts: 2330
PostPosted: Mon Aug 28, 2023 5:36 am Reply with quote
TarsTarkas wrote:
Key wasn't talking about personal negative opinions of fans of the franchise that you keep to yourself, but rather about people who allow their hatred to spill over into the forums.

Reality is reality, and fiction is fiction. You can enjoy both, while still acknowledging that we live in real life.


Yes, I understood what he was saying.

The point in my reply, since you seem to have missed it quite completely, was that I think it's silly to demand people keep these negative views entirely to themselves when we literally have some posters who regularly argue that "everyone" has urges to sexualize children, and others claiming that torture and sexual assault are appropriate replies to breaking a figurine if you're mad enough about it. And folks like you who then defend these views by insisting "fiction is fiction", as if these are not general unqualified statements of principle, and you believe the folks espousing them are the viewer equivalents of method actors.

I don't think my contempt is hidden for these views, and honestly don't think it should be. Yet, there is a middle way between yelling with the kind of seething, name-calling anger Key described and, at the opposite extreme, maintaining a completely neutral tone and pretending every perspective is equally deserving of polite respect.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Blanchimont



Joined: 25 Feb 2012
Posts: 3459
Location: Finland
PostPosted: Mon Aug 28, 2023 6:11 am Reply with quote
NeverConvex wrote:
The point in my reply, since you seem to have missed it quite completely, was that I think it's silly to demand people keep these negative views entirely to themselves when we have some posters who regularly argue that "everyone" wants has urges to sexualize children, and others claiming that torture and sexual assault are appropriate replies to breaking a figurine if you're mad enough about it.


Who are these poster who claim "everyone"? Because I don't remember anyone claiming that here.

And I disagree equating it quite with 'torture' and 'sexual assault' in that scene, Rudy was not the one to initiate the fight to begin with and the confinement was more of a lecture than any kind of torture, Rudy forgetting them was actually more funny if anything. Truth be told the groping scene felt more like a comedy sketch with how he tried to check his ED... though overall I agree Rudy may have went a bit far bullying the bullies, but at least the lesson was learned.

Quote:
And folks like you who then defend these views by insisting "fiction is fiction", as if these are not general unqualified statements of principle, and you believe the folks espousing them are the viewer equivalents of method actors.

The only one calling them 'method actors" is yourself in that other thread. And fiction is fiction, there's nothing wrong enjoying a good story(which Mushoku Tensei undoubtedly is) no matter how gross it may get.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NeverConvex
Subscriber



Joined: 08 Jun 2013
Posts: 2330
PostPosted: Mon Aug 28, 2023 6:24 am Reply with quote
Blanchimont wrote:
Who are these "everyone"? Because I don't remember anyone saying that here.


Hikaru Not Takuya was the poster, if I remember correctly, and I think the most recent post about it (though far from the only one) was actually actively removed by Lynzee. I believe you've also been criticized repeatedly for defending sexualization of children in media, though you tend to at least carefully avoid making unqualified statements about reality based on it.

'everyone' was not a description of the percentage of people saying it, FWIW, but this is clear if you read the sentence correctly.

Blanchimont wrote:
The only one calling them 'method actors" is yourself in that other thread.


It's almost like it's a succinct way of summarizing the view expressed by many people who believe comments about media have nothing to do with reality and can only be addressed or even discussed using in-world concepts. Yet, without using literally the same words as them. A shocking avoidance of copy/paste in language, I know.

I don't really have any desire to have an extended conversation with you, in any case, so I'll let this be my only reply to you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gamen



Joined: 13 Jun 2006
Posts: 225
PostPosted: Mon Aug 28, 2023 7:06 am Reply with quote
NeverConvex wrote:
It's almost like it's a succinct way of summarizing the view expressed by many people who believe comments about media have nothing to do with reality and can only be addressed or even discussed using in-world concepts. Yet, without using literally the same words as them. A shocking avoidance of copy/paste in language, I know.


In recent years, I've heard it called the "Thermian Argument" (and I think I heard it first on ANN), even though the originator himself admitted when he coined it that the Thermians from Galaxy Quest did not have the concept of fiction, which is quite a separate issue from countering criticism of objectionable content in a work by using textual evidence that justifies its existence.

But it basically describes the same situation where supporters and detractors end up talking past each other because supporters are critiquing how well the narrative hangs together, and the detractors are criticizing it for the author's choices and the real-world effect of its message and how they simply don't like it, and the discussion goes around in circles. Like it has.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
2-2Distracted



Joined: 03 Feb 2021
Posts: 148
PostPosted: Mon Aug 28, 2023 7:06 am Reply with quote
Blanchimont wrote:
And I disagree equating it quite with 'torture' and 'sexual assault' in that scene, Rudy was not the one to initiate the fight to begin with and the confinement was more of a lecture than any kind of torture, Rudy forgetting them was actually more funny if anything. Truth be told the groping scene felt more like a comedy sketch with how he tried to check his ED... though overall I agree Rudy may have went a bit far bullying the bullies, but at least the lesson was learned.

This is exactly the kind of crap people are complaining about. There was absolutely no reason for this whole situation to play out this way and it only did because the author thinks this is both "actually pretty funny" and the only way to further this abysmal subplot. The very fact that it played out like this is exactly the reason it's Not a good story, because no good story would have their main character, who BTW has suffered abuse and sexual assault himself once upon a time ago, subject others to the same thing for his own personal reasons, it's inconsistent bad writing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
NeverConvex
Subscriber



Joined: 08 Jun 2013
Posts: 2330
PostPosted: Mon Aug 28, 2023 7:08 am Reply with quote
Gamen wrote:
In recent years, I've heard it called the "Thermian Argument" (and I think I heard it first on ANN)


Oh, neat. Hadn't heard that term before

Gamen wrote:
even though the originator himself admitted when he coined it that the Thermians from Galaxy Quest did not have the concept of fiction


Self-referentially making the term 'Thermian Argument' itself impossible to source in a Thermian fashion from the canon it was derived from Laughing That's great.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gamen



Joined: 13 Jun 2006
Posts: 225
PostPosted: Mon Aug 28, 2023 7:37 am Reply with quote
NeverConvex wrote:
Self-referentially making the term 'Thermian Argument' itself impossible to source in a Thermian fashion from the canon it was derived from Laughing That's great.


Yeah, I like the term since it's the first time I heard someone put a name to the phenomenon. Despite the fact that the originator was himself equating any and all use of the argument with defending the strawman of orc rape pornography. The rebuttals weren't great either, often focusing on the construction of his argument instead of attacking the premise of cultural censorship itself. It was like a parody of the Thermian Argument itself.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Blanchimont



Joined: 25 Feb 2012
Posts: 3459
Location: Finland
PostPosted: Mon Aug 28, 2023 8:22 am Reply with quote
2-2Distracted wrote:
The very fact that it played out like this is exactly the reason it's Not a good story, because no good story would have their main character, who BTW has suffered abuse and sexual assault himself once upon a time ago, subject others to the same thing for his own personal reasons, it's inconsistent bad writing.

I respectfully disagree. I think it's a good story and the author is creating a very compelling and immersive world, and that Rudy's actions do make sense in-universe.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gamen



Joined: 13 Jun 2006
Posts: 225
PostPosted: Mon Aug 28, 2023 8:36 am Reply with quote
Blanchimont wrote:
I respectfully disagree. I think it's a good story and the author is creating a very compelling and immersive world, and that Rudy's actions do make sense in-universe.

Well that's what I call a weak argument. Here's a better one; Rudeus has been anything but inconsistent in his groping of girls, from Lilia to Eris to now Linia and Pursena, and he'd only toned it down until recently because of his ED, his lack of sex drive, than because of some epiphany towards respecting the bodily autonomy of women. Consistency is good writing.

That's however not to conflate good writing with a good story. Ruijerd's about the only one to give him any pushback on molesting a girl, but in-story his major flaw is being so stubbornly set in his ways that Rudy has to teach him to be flexible about his morals. Otherwise the world is quite permissive and forgiving of sexual assault. Consistently so.

Edit: Of course, arguably it's also as much bad writing to have inconsistencies and deus ex machina that discourage the reader from being invested in the story as it is to have a main character that's so unsympathetic that the reader is no longer interested in their story.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
2-2Distracted



Joined: 03 Feb 2021
Posts: 148
PostPosted: Mon Aug 28, 2023 10:02 am Reply with quote
Gamen wrote:
In recent years, I've heard it called the "Thermian Argument" (and I think I heard it first on ANN), even though the originator himself admitted when he coined it that the Thermians from Galaxy Quest did not have the concept of fiction, which is quite a separate issue from countering criticism of objectionable content in a work by using textual evidence that justifies its existence.

But it basically describes the same situation where supporters and detractors end up talking past each other because supporters are critiquing how well the narrative hangs together, and the detractors are criticizing it for the author's choices and the real-world effect of its message and how they simply don't like it, and the discussion goes around in circles. Like it has.

Which basically means that one side is arguing the Watsonian" whilst the other is arguing the "Doylist" - for anyone wondering what that they should check out the Tvtropes.org page on it, and a quick example would be something like "Why is the Joker from the DC Batman comics still alive after everything he's done?"

- Watsonian: because Gotham is too corrupt, the Joker is a super genius and a brilliant escape artist, and no one is willing or able to kill him.

- Doylist: because he's one of Detective Comics' biggest cash cow, right next to regular Batman comics, WW comics, and Superman comics.

And I mean, why wouldn't this happen? Bringing up the in-universe reasoning for the writing works, even when you know the line of reasoning doesn't make sense is bound to get a response from someone pointing out that it was the author choice to write something this way.

Anyone remember when Hideo Kojima tried to come with a really dumb explanation for Quiet from Metal Gear Solid is constantly half naked?

Shield Hero was practically roasted week after week when it was airing because fans of the work, and the work itself, tried & failed to argue with nonsensical in-universe reasons for why things work the way they do, ESPECIALLY when it came to how tried it to handwave why it was okay for the main character to have slaves in his party.

Mushoku Tensei isn't unique in this & honestly speaking it deserves to have have this happen to it as well, especially when the author won't shut up about his poor writing choices on Twitter.

Meanwhile you have writers like Yoko Taro and the creator of Redo of a Healer who just flat out said that they wrote their respective nonsensical situations because they simply wanted to, with the former explaining that the reason 2B/9S/A2/YorHa bots are dressed the way they are is because he liked it, and as for the latter the reason Redo is so trashy is because the author wanted to take all of his teenage edge-phase ideas and pour it all into a single work in order to basically get it all out of his system.

I'd have much more respect for Rifujin if he & his fanbase just straight up admitted what we all know by now, that he's writing these stupid subplots and relationships because he clearly he likes it. It's really not that hard Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
2-2Distracted



Joined: 03 Feb 2021
Posts: 148
PostPosted: Mon Aug 28, 2023 10:23 am Reply with quote
Gamen wrote:
Well that's what I call a weak argument. Here's a better one; Rudeus has been anything but inconsistent in his groping of girls, from Lilia to Eris to now Linia and Pursena, and he'd only toned it down until recently because of his ED, his lack of sex drive, than because of some epiphany towards respecting the bodily autonomy of women. Consistency is good writing.

That's the thing tho isn't? Rudeus actual Has grown to respect the bodily autonomy of women, just look at the sex scene at the end season 1- wherein he's gone from seeing Eris as an object to get him off to recognizing where her head is at, sympathizing with her emotions and overall actually Not trying sleep with her because of how depressed she actually is.

Throughout that scene he does almost everything in his to respect her and her bodily autonomy because he can recognize what she's going through. This scene of course gets ruined seconds later because the author just couldn't let things be & decided to manufacture a badly written and unnecessary sex scene between a 40 year old and a 15 year old, which he still tries to make consistent by making sure Rudeus isn't in anyway at fault.

Compare that whole scene with this, where suddenly Rudeus has no idea what respecting the bodily autonomy of women even means & goes on to sexually abuse 2 women for no good reason.

It's inconsistent, bad writing. Nowhere from that scene to this scene are we given the idea that Rudeus only respects the women in his life, like Eris or Roxy for instance, we're simply given the impression that he now respects all women until we're evidently & abruptly proven wrong.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Blanchimont



Joined: 25 Feb 2012
Posts: 3459
Location: Finland
PostPosted: Mon Aug 28, 2023 10:40 am Reply with quote
2-2Distracted wrote:
I'd have much more respect for Rifujin if he & his fanbase just straight up admitted what we all know by now, that he's writing these stupid subplots and relationships because he clearly he likes it. It's really not that hard Laughing

I mean, he writes the story so, why wouldn't he like it? I don't remember any comment here saying otherwise. That of course has no bearing on what he or we readers like in real life.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
2-2Distracted



Joined: 03 Feb 2021
Posts: 148
PostPosted: Mon Aug 28, 2023 11:19 am Reply with quote
Blanchimont wrote:
2-2Distracted wrote:
I'd have much more respect for Rifujin if he & his fanbase just straight up admitted what we all know by now, that he's writing these stupid subplots and relationships because he clearly he likes it. It's really not that hard Laughing

I mean, he writes the story so, why wouldn't he like it? I don't remember any comment here saying otherwise. That of course has no bearing on what he or we readers like in real life.


If he simply liked it, he wouldn't try to constant make excuses for why he likes it. It gives off the impression that he's being facetious when he's trying to tell a serious story.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Blanchimont



Joined: 25 Feb 2012
Posts: 3459
Location: Finland
PostPosted: Mon Aug 28, 2023 11:28 am Reply with quote
2-2Distracted wrote:
If he simply liked it, he wouldn't try to constant make excuses for why he likes it. It gives off the impression that he's being facetious when he's trying to tell a serious story.

He gave a description of Rudy's train of thought and why he acted as he did. I don't see that as an excuse.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Gamen



Joined: 13 Jun 2006
Posts: 225
PostPosted: Mon Aug 28, 2023 11:42 am Reply with quote
2-2Distracted wrote:
That's the thing tho isn't? Rudeus actual Has grown to respect the bodily autonomy of women, just look at the sex scene at the end season 1- wherein he's gone from seeing Eris as an object to get him off to recognizing where her head is at, sympathizing with her emotions and overall actually Not trying sleep with her because of how depressed she actually is.


I'd say the lesson he learned there was that if a girl that can kick his ass dresses in lingerie and comes to his bed, he should let her take the initiative because he's not getting laid otherwise. And he learned that lesson then, in episode 8, and yet continued to peep/grope/etc. and generally be a sex pest to her. I mean, he wouldn't exactly be unusual for a molester to be rationalizing his actions as just "harmless" touching...

Arguably it's the same as a male lead copping a feel when he trips in a lucky sukebe event, or one girl feeling up another's boobs when they're in the bath together, just without the transparent (and increasingly futile) framing to make it less creepy...


Point is, no, I don't think he learned the lesson you think he did.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Anime News Network Forum Index -> Site-related -> Talkback All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous    Next
Page 21 of 23

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group